Wednesday, January 03, 2007
At some point the EGO must be sacrificed to save the lives.
Bush is getting ready to Surge in Iraq.
George Bush is getting ready to push a surge on to the country, a surge of troops into the morass that is Iraq. He is asking the country to allow more troops to be sent into the Fiasco he created in the country of Iraq even though he does not have a plan for victory or a strategy for withdrawal. Bush wants to put in more troops so he an look strong, look like he is doing something after he got spanked last November in a national election, and undermined by the Iraq Study Group. The ISG said Iraq is real bad and getting worse.
Bush now wants to make more American sons and daughters to enter into that country in the beginnings of a civil war. He wants to try to save his legacy with more US blood. Blood from soldiers who just no longer believe that we have a strategy for victory, and the majority of whom no longer believe in the War. Bush wants people to die and get maimed just so he does not have to say he was wrong.
Wrong for lying about the WMD’s
Wrong for ignoring Gen Shinseki.
Wrong for “Mission Accomplishment”.
Wrong for “the insurgency is in it’s last throes”.
Wrong for “stay the course”.
Wrong for “bring it on”.
Wrong for calling those who realized the war was illegal and immoral traitors.
Wrong for ignoring Generals who called for a change in strategy.
Wrong for refusing to fire Rumsfeld last year instead of the day after the election.
WRONG
Sending more troops into Iraq in 2007 is as wrong as it was sending MORE troops into Vietnam in 1968 when Gen Westmoreland asked Lyndon Johnson to do it. Iraq is past any possible American Military victory with 150,000 or even 200,000 troops. Iraq is no longer an insurgency but an actual civil war between two groups who have fought before for control.
Bush failed, he had NO plan, and allowed Cheney and Rumsfeld to use a flawed strategy and inadequate force to invade a country and NOT secure it.
They failed to secure the weapons, like the US did in Germany and Japan after the WW2 surrenders.
They Failed to secure the weapons and Ammunition in Iraq like they did at the end of WW2. They failed to improve the lives of the Iraqi people because the republican patricians they outsourced the Iraq reconstruction were in for the MONEY, not the mission. They hired 25 year old campaign workers from 2004 who had NO experience in reconstruction of a war torn country.
They hired Bernie Kerik to reconstitute the Iraqi police so they lost a year with rising chaos. The same Bernie Kerik who had to drop out of contention for Director of Homeland security because of his criminal problems. A man who was barely qualified to be NYC police commissioner, let alone rebuild a police force from scratch.
They passed out contracts to US companies which bypassed the Iraqi people. They allowed unemployment to rise, electricity production to fall. Potable water supplies to fail. Governmental services to suffer along with the people. They branded an entire group of people who KNEW how to make Iraq work criminals and then wondered why Iraq did NOT work any more.
They did the dumbest thing possible most of the time, and people suffered, both Iraqi civilians which fed the insurgency, and US troops who were trying in vain to stabilize the country and get it back on it’s feet. They failed in 2003, 2004, 2005 2006, and each year the War got worse. The war got more violent, and sectarian violence grew even when they ignored it. People were forced out of their homes and neighborhoods, and the Americans who failed to secure Iraq in 2003 were powerless to stop it in 2006.
They did not protect the people in 2003 from the Iraqi insurgents or out of control American contractors and military personnel, and NOW they barely can protect barricaded areas of Baghdad. The entire province of Anbar is lost, cities like Ramadi and Fallugha are too dangerous for patrols unless they act like major combat operations continue. Now in 2006 they are fighting for control of Baghdad a city that supposedly fell April 9th 2003. Stalingrad comes to mind when I think of this.
They were wrong about so much for so long I wonder why anybody listens to them any more. Why is Bush even given the change to send 20,00 more young Americans into the meatgrinder to kill more Iraqis and die in a country that no longer wants us there?
Why is anybody listening to Bush at all?
Why is a war criminal allowed to continue to pursue his war crimes?
Why are American and Iraqi lives being sacrificed to save a EGO?
At some point the EGO must be sacrificed to save the lives.
George Bush is getting ready to push a surge on to the country, a surge of troops into the morass that is Iraq. He is asking the country to allow more troops to be sent into the Fiasco he created in the country of Iraq even though he does not have a plan for victory or a strategy for withdrawal. Bush wants to put in more troops so he an look strong, look like he is doing something after he got spanked last November in a national election, and undermined by the Iraq Study Group. The ISG said Iraq is real bad and getting worse.
Bush now wants to make more American sons and daughters to enter into that country in the beginnings of a civil war. He wants to try to save his legacy with more US blood. Blood from soldiers who just no longer believe that we have a strategy for victory, and the majority of whom no longer believe in the War. Bush wants people to die and get maimed just so he does not have to say he was wrong.
Wrong for lying about the WMD’s
Wrong for ignoring Gen Shinseki.
Wrong for “Mission Accomplishment”.
Wrong for “the insurgency is in it’s last throes”.
Wrong for “stay the course”.
Wrong for “bring it on”.
Wrong for calling those who realized the war was illegal and immoral traitors.
Wrong for ignoring Generals who called for a change in strategy.
Wrong for refusing to fire Rumsfeld last year instead of the day after the election.
WRONG
Sending more troops into Iraq in 2007 is as wrong as it was sending MORE troops into Vietnam in 1968 when Gen Westmoreland asked Lyndon Johnson to do it. Iraq is past any possible American Military victory with 150,000 or even 200,000 troops. Iraq is no longer an insurgency but an actual civil war between two groups who have fought before for control.
Bush failed, he had NO plan, and allowed Cheney and Rumsfeld to use a flawed strategy and inadequate force to invade a country and NOT secure it.
They failed to secure the weapons, like the US did in Germany and Japan after the WW2 surrenders.
They Failed to secure the weapons and Ammunition in Iraq like they did at the end of WW2. They failed to improve the lives of the Iraqi people because the republican patricians they outsourced the Iraq reconstruction were in for the MONEY, not the mission. They hired 25 year old campaign workers from 2004 who had NO experience in reconstruction of a war torn country.
They hired Bernie Kerik to reconstitute the Iraqi police so they lost a year with rising chaos. The same Bernie Kerik who had to drop out of contention for Director of Homeland security because of his criminal problems. A man who was barely qualified to be NYC police commissioner, let alone rebuild a police force from scratch.
They passed out contracts to US companies which bypassed the Iraqi people. They allowed unemployment to rise, electricity production to fall. Potable water supplies to fail. Governmental services to suffer along with the people. They branded an entire group of people who KNEW how to make Iraq work criminals and then wondered why Iraq did NOT work any more.
They did the dumbest thing possible most of the time, and people suffered, both Iraqi civilians which fed the insurgency, and US troops who were trying in vain to stabilize the country and get it back on it’s feet. They failed in 2003, 2004, 2005 2006, and each year the War got worse. The war got more violent, and sectarian violence grew even when they ignored it. People were forced out of their homes and neighborhoods, and the Americans who failed to secure Iraq in 2003 were powerless to stop it in 2006.
They did not protect the people in 2003 from the Iraqi insurgents or out of control American contractors and military personnel, and NOW they barely can protect barricaded areas of Baghdad. The entire province of Anbar is lost, cities like Ramadi and Fallugha are too dangerous for patrols unless they act like major combat operations continue. Now in 2006 they are fighting for control of Baghdad a city that supposedly fell April 9th 2003. Stalingrad comes to mind when I think of this.
They were wrong about so much for so long I wonder why anybody listens to them any more. Why is Bush even given the change to send 20,00 more young Americans into the meatgrinder to kill more Iraqis and die in a country that no longer wants us there?
Why is anybody listening to Bush at all?
Why is a war criminal allowed to continue to pursue his war crimes?
Why are American and Iraqi lives being sacrificed to save a EGO?
At some point the EGO must be sacrificed to save the lives.
Comments:
<< Home
Right on brother Clif! We've asked 'why' for years now and all we get is crickets chirping from the most disgusting vile bunches of pieces of crap in the White House. Well, one thing is for sure, the escalation will be blamed on Bush in the future. He can't even blame this catastrophy on future presidents now. He could have done the noble, non-egotistical thing by redeploying our troops out now, but nope! He's too much of a freaking egomaniac to do something as rational as that!
Hell, let the asshole completely wreck his own future history. There is nothing he can do now to save himself and he's had the chances to do it too, but he's too stupid and narcissist to even notice!!!
I hate him. I hate his illegal occupation too.
Hell, let the asshole completely wreck his own future history. There is nothing he can do now to save himself and he's had the chances to do it too, but he's too stupid and narcissist to even notice!!!
I hate him. I hate his illegal occupation too.
Clif; call your pal, "Nancy Pelosi". Tell her to defund the war. It's now known that Saddam killed 1.5 million Iraqis, mostly with WMD. BIG DEAL!, right? Call Harry Reid; tell him to forget about multimillion AZ real estate deals and abandon Iraq to Al Queda!
You and the democrats own the war now. You've said you're a great military savant. What's the next move, "Big Boy?"
You and the democrats own the war now. You've said you're a great military savant. What's the next move, "Big Boy?"
Puss boy your dumb as dirt son, WE do NOT own a war with BUSH still constitutionally the commander in chief. We are NOT in charge of the pentagon nor the military, and gutless the repugnant assclowns did push both the Pentagon and Homeland security appropriation bills through before they left last year, so the democrats have little ability to cut funding because the bills are LAW now for this year son, Jay-e-sass H Key-rist are you stupid boy.
Saddam DID not kill 1.5 million Iraqis with WMD's son Your a fucking liar.
He probably did not like 1.5 million Iraqis in the Iraq war with Iran which Reagan Bush and Rumsfeld sold Saddam weapons to fight, as they were selling the Iranians to fight back with.
He did use WMD's on that battle field, but the majority of the deaths were from Iranian human wave attacks into Iraqi mechanized infantry and armor units.
BTW pussboy if Bush is the commander in chief and he alone gets to command the troops how do any democrat OWN any part of the war?
Or are YOU calling for impeachment son?
Saddam DID not kill 1.5 million Iraqis with WMD's son Your a fucking liar.
He probably did not like 1.5 million Iraqis in the Iraq war with Iran which Reagan Bush and Rumsfeld sold Saddam weapons to fight, as they were selling the Iranians to fight back with.
He did use WMD's on that battle field, but the majority of the deaths were from Iranian human wave attacks into Iraqi mechanized infantry and armor units.
BTW pussboy if Bush is the commander in chief and he alone gets to command the troops how do any democrat OWN any part of the war?
Or are YOU calling for impeachment son?
Let me see if I have this straight...
Saddam Hussein before 1980 was a tyrannt and a thug. He was killing his family members etc. Knowing this, the republicans in the 1980's couldn't wait to do business with him because they loved him so much. Wow! They prop Saddam up, use him, and give him WMD to use against the Iranians, which they do, and the republicans just ignore everything back them because they were complicit in Saddam's criminal activity and war crimes. All through the 1980's the republicans never say a bad word about Saddam until Bush Sr., another republican, decides to turn his back on Saddam's activities and then accuses him of stealing oil on land that he thought was his. Bush Sr. starts a war and then tell the Iraqis to stand up against Saddam, which they do, and then Bush Sr. pulls out and Saddam uses left over gases or whatever to kill some of them.
Clinton launches a missile into Iraq and Saddam backs off.
Baby George comes to power after being selected by a bunch of idiots on the US Supreme court and he's been talking about going after Saddam for trying to kill his father (I've never seen proof that this even happened). 9/11 happens and the first thing out of his mouth is Iraq. He lies to America that Saddam has wmd and forgets to tell the Congress and the world that all the inspectors over the years have said that there were no wmd. Doesn't matter, Bush lies and gets what he wants.
Saddam is caught and Bush forgets to tell the American people that 15 of the 19 hijackers were SAUDI ARABIANS but insists that Saddam was directly connected to 9/11. A lie of course.
We hold Saddam throughout the whole trial for killing 148 people. He's never tried for killing THOUSANDS, but instead is lynched by a handpicked death squad of Bush's. Why? BECAUSE IF SADDAM WASN'T HUNG OR KILLED IT WOULD MEAN THAT THE IRAQIS WOULD CONTINUE WITH THE TRIALS AND THE TRUTH OF HOW THE CURRENT MEMBERS OF THE BUSH REGIME ALONG WITH PAST REPUBLICANS WOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE IN CONNECTION WITH THE DEALINGS THEY HAD WITH SADDAM HUSSEIN.
They killed him to silence him.
This explains why JOHN NEGROPONTE just quit.
The End.
Saddam Hussein before 1980 was a tyrannt and a thug. He was killing his family members etc. Knowing this, the republicans in the 1980's couldn't wait to do business with him because they loved him so much. Wow! They prop Saddam up, use him, and give him WMD to use against the Iranians, which they do, and the republicans just ignore everything back them because they were complicit in Saddam's criminal activity and war crimes. All through the 1980's the republicans never say a bad word about Saddam until Bush Sr., another republican, decides to turn his back on Saddam's activities and then accuses him of stealing oil on land that he thought was his. Bush Sr. starts a war and then tell the Iraqis to stand up against Saddam, which they do, and then Bush Sr. pulls out and Saddam uses left over gases or whatever to kill some of them.
Clinton launches a missile into Iraq and Saddam backs off.
Baby George comes to power after being selected by a bunch of idiots on the US Supreme court and he's been talking about going after Saddam for trying to kill his father (I've never seen proof that this even happened). 9/11 happens and the first thing out of his mouth is Iraq. He lies to America that Saddam has wmd and forgets to tell the Congress and the world that all the inspectors over the years have said that there were no wmd. Doesn't matter, Bush lies and gets what he wants.
Saddam is caught and Bush forgets to tell the American people that 15 of the 19 hijackers were SAUDI ARABIANS but insists that Saddam was directly connected to 9/11. A lie of course.
We hold Saddam throughout the whole trial for killing 148 people. He's never tried for killing THOUSANDS, but instead is lynched by a handpicked death squad of Bush's. Why? BECAUSE IF SADDAM WASN'T HUNG OR KILLED IT WOULD MEAN THAT THE IRAQIS WOULD CONTINUE WITH THE TRIALS AND THE TRUTH OF HOW THE CURRENT MEMBERS OF THE BUSH REGIME ALONG WITH PAST REPUBLICANS WOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE IN CONNECTION WITH THE DEALINGS THEY HAD WITH SADDAM HUSSEIN.
They killed him to silence him.
This explains why JOHN NEGROPONTE just quit.
The End.
BTW pussboy if Bush is the commander in chief and he alone gets to command the troops how do any democrat OWN any part of the war?
Congress owns the purse strings, so the Democrats own the war. That's the way it works in the USA. Ask Richard Nixon!
Congress owns the purse strings, so the Democrats own the war. That's the way it works in the USA. Ask Richard Nixon!
Aha! Then you're admitting that the republicans have been in control over 12 years and this is why the country is so fucked up! Thank you Bushboy for admitting that to us!
You're talking to liberals. We will give the democrats a chance and if they fuck up, we'll do something about it. You? You would suck Bush's balls if he decided to rip up the Constitution because PARTY COMES BEFORE COUNTRY to you neocons!!!
When the troops start coming home, we don't want to hear a word from you Bushboy. Let the grownups handle this. We've seen what a bunch of overly religious wacko children have done over the years.
You're talking to liberals. We will give the democrats a chance and if they fuck up, we'll do something about it. You? You would suck Bush's balls if he decided to rip up the Constitution because PARTY COMES BEFORE COUNTRY to you neocons!!!
When the troops start coming home, we don't want to hear a word from you Bushboy. Let the grownups handle this. We've seen what a bunch of overly religious wacko children have done over the years.
This coward Pus boy comes on here to make his absurd arguments so he can feel like a big man.
When are you signing up for your glorious war Pus boy?
Why won't you answer me?
I'll tell you why. BECAUSE YOU ARE A COWARD! Not to mention a hypocrite. Hey, they might send you to Afghanastan! But most likely to EYE-rack. So do your duty you brave little pig and sign up! They need you for target practice over there,tough guy!
What a fucking moron..
MikeytheAsskickerof neoconlovingPigs
When are you signing up for your glorious war Pus boy?
Why won't you answer me?
I'll tell you why. BECAUSE YOU ARE A COWARD! Not to mention a hypocrite. Hey, they might send you to Afghanastan! But most likely to EYE-rack. So do your duty you brave little pig and sign up! They need you for target practice over there,tough guy!
What a fucking moron..
MikeytheAsskickerof neoconlovingPigs
Aha! My statements are true. Saddam Hussein has always been a republican thug. He's been their master. He's also the guy who holds all the republican American thugs secrets. This is why he was murdered by the very people who illegally invaded his country, stole his riches along with Americas, and who were helping Saddam kill people all these years!
Scum....every single one of ya.
Scum....every single one of ya.
LOL Mikey. Bushboy is a creep. He would never waste his beautiful mind fighting the Bush Family Transaction Wars! Hell no, he would much rather stick a yellow ribbon on the back of his car, because to him and the rest of the neocons, this is just like being on the front lines of an illegal occupation!
Pigs.
Pigs.
Puss boy your reading comprehension is severely limited son, the appropriations bills for defense and homeland security for 2007 are LAW son, they are no longer something that congress has any real say in. They have already given Bush the money for this year and Bush can move the money around the defense department any way he wants and congress has little constitutional power to do anything about it. So your as full of shit as usual son. It is NOT a democratic war as far as appropriations is considered until either bush returns to ask for a supplemental or Fiscal year 2008.
Until then the purse strings were cut LAST year by the repugnants.
Try another LIE son, your so good at lying for a Christian son. I guess you the kind of Christian who has the do as I say not as I dochurch, and ignores the words of Jesus, because it is NOW inconvenient for you.
Your probably the kind that picks and chooses which words of Jesus you think are important because HE definately would have NEVER sanctioned this war son.
he would have called it Ceaser's work, NOT Gods work.
Nice to see who your really following son, a modern day Pharisee who is more like a Ceaser, NOT the man from Galilee.
Until then the purse strings were cut LAST year by the repugnants.
Try another LIE son, your so good at lying for a Christian son. I guess you the kind of Christian who has the do as I say not as I dochurch, and ignores the words of Jesus, because it is NOW inconvenient for you.
Your probably the kind that picks and chooses which words of Jesus you think are important because HE definately would have NEVER sanctioned this war son.
he would have called it Ceaser's work, NOT Gods work.
Nice to see who your really following son, a modern day Pharisee who is more like a Ceaser, NOT the man from Galilee.
The democrats own the pursestrings. They now own the war. Everybody in America knows this except Kay and Clif. Nancy Pelosi is an Italian grandmother. You can kiss your gay friend's asses and your Muslim friend's asses down the drain. Denny Hastert was a wimp. Nancy isn't.
Until this idiot can give a straight answer to a simple question, I vote he be banned here too, just as he has been at ablog.
One more time,
When are you signing up for the escalation in Iraq? They need troops.
And if not, Why not? What is your excuse?
Mikey
One more time,
When are you signing up for the escalation in Iraq? They need troops.
And if not, Why not? What is your excuse?
Mikey
When are you signing up for the escalation in Iraq? They need troops.
And if not, Why not? What is your excuse? Mikey
1/03/2007 09:51:40 PM
I'm over the age limit, Mikey, but Halliburton probably would take me. I'll sign up if you will and we can take turns riding shotgun. They'll probably let us bring our own weapons plus the normal issue.
I hear they're paying over 200G's a year.
And if not, Why not? What is your excuse? Mikey
1/03/2007 09:51:40 PM
I'm over the age limit, Mikey, but Halliburton probably would take me. I'll sign up if you will and we can take turns riding shotgun. They'll probably let us bring our own weapons plus the normal issue.
I hear they're paying over 200G's a year.
Puss boy why alway leave yourself an out boy, if you have the balls sign up son, either that or you just gutless but pretending to be brave, but always having SOMEBODY else sign up also, where's YOUR balls son?
In your boyfriends mouth?
In your boyfriends mouth?
Nobody owns the war assclown, there IS only One man who is commander in chief giving ORDERS to the military to send in MORE troops boy, give it up son YOUR a gutless lying volkstrum.
the democrats do NOT own the War it is Bush's war, he started it, fanned the flames of it, ignored the advice of the Generals, fired a few, and demanded to stay the course even though it was creating the Fiasco we have NOW, AND he ignores people like Jim Baker and 20 generals who are against the escalation of this illegal war, NO son it is Bush's war beginning to end.
And NO GOP spin or talking point is gonna change that asswipe.
the democrats do NOT own the War it is Bush's war, he started it, fanned the flames of it, ignored the advice of the Generals, fired a few, and demanded to stay the course even though it was creating the Fiasco we have NOW, AND he ignores people like Jim Baker and 20 generals who are against the escalation of this illegal war, NO son it is Bush's war beginning to end.
And NO GOP spin or talking point is gonna change that asswipe.
Liberals don't have to fight this illegal occupation Bushboy because we've been dead set against it since Bush first uttered 'Iraq' to our nation. You have to though. Bush wants 20,000 more troops and he'll take you and the gays if he has to. He's desperate. Now, go sign up you chickenshit!!! You're only as old as you feel and if you feel like you're 90 years old, blame your loyalty to Bush for that one.
Remember, he needs you.
Remember, he needs you.
BTW puss boy Nixon never had a problem with appropriation during Vietnam in fact it was NOT until after the peace treaty in 1973 and the US troops were withdrawn from Vietnam that congress decided not to fund the defense of a foreign country even though The Dulles brothers created it in 1954.
The south Vietnamese either had to fund their defense or they could no longer ignore the will of the 90% who wanted to reunify a country the Dulles brothers decided to cut in half in 1954.
So not only are your facts as full of shit as you are son, your grasp of history is as ill-informed as your understanding of the Iraqi war is son. Empty and stupid, what else would we expect from a neo-con troll who is sent in AFTER the repugs loses an election?
Your the volkstrum of the backwash son.
The south Vietnamese either had to fund their defense or they could no longer ignore the will of the 90% who wanted to reunify a country the Dulles brothers decided to cut in half in 1954.
So not only are your facts as full of shit as you are son, your grasp of history is as ill-informed as your understanding of the Iraqi war is son. Empty and stupid, what else would we expect from a neo-con troll who is sent in AFTER the repugs loses an election?
Your the volkstrum of the backwash son.
KayInMaine said...Who wants to bet Bushboy is actually 34? I bet he is.
If Busboy was 34?, You would be sitting on his face in the snow......Even us old timers knew how to have fun!...
If Busboy was 34?, You would be sitting on his face in the snow......Even us old timers knew how to have fun!...
clif said...Your the volkstrum of the backwash son.
1/03/2007 10:45:28 PM
OK, Clif, you don't know what "volkstrum" means. Why not just quit using the word and not making yourself out to be an idiot? I don't give a rat's ass about it, but you keep pushing it.
Just keep reading military history; making wrong assumptions; and tell yourself how great it would be if you were the CIC.
1/03/2007 10:45:28 PM
OK, Clif, you don't know what "volkstrum" means. Why not just quit using the word and not making yourself out to be an idiot? I don't give a rat's ass about it, but you keep pushing it.
Just keep reading military history; making wrong assumptions; and tell yourself how great it would be if you were the CIC.
king george has made the decree.
parliment.. er.. congress has no power over him anymore.
king george III went mad, now our king george has gone mad.
its time to remove him before its too late.
parliment.. er.. congress has no power over him anymore.
king george III went mad, now our king george has gone mad.
its time to remove him before its too late.
Chris from Maine said...king george III went mad, its time to remove him before its too late. 1/03/2007 11:52:18 PM
Chris, could you pull in some arctic weather on the east cost? We're freezing our asses off in OK and the nat gas prices are in the cellar! You guys are having a "Bermuda" winter....
Chris, could you pull in some arctic weather on the east cost? We're freezing our asses off in OK and the nat gas prices are in the cellar! You guys are having a "Bermuda" winter....
Puss boy Ich verstein das verd der "volkstrum" herr schiesencoft, but YOU do not son, so I am not the person who is
making yourself out to be an idiot
You are son. BTW boy if you did NOT care about it son, YOU would NOT keep bringing it up all the time, like YOU do.
SON I do NOT have to read military history son, I learned it in ROTC and the Active Army when I served, they kind of expect Officers to study that.
I do not need to read about something I studied as part of MY job for years.
But continue to try to deflect your IGNORANCE to others, maybe NOBODY will notice you know very little but spew a hell of a lot of BULLSHIT anyway son.
making yourself out to be an idiot
You are son. BTW boy if you did NOT care about it son, YOU would NOT keep bringing it up all the time, like YOU do.
SON I do NOT have to read military history son, I learned it in ROTC and the Active Army when I served, they kind of expect Officers to study that.
I do not need to read about something I studied as part of MY job for years.
But continue to try to deflect your IGNORANCE to others, maybe NOBODY will notice you know very little but spew a hell of a lot of BULLSHIT anyway son.
clif said...Puss boy Ich verstein das verd der "volkstrum" herr schiesencoft, but YOU do not son, so I am not the person who is making yourself out to be an idiot
So, what's the true translation of "volkstrum"?
So, what's the true translation of "volkstrum"?
clif said..Puss boy Ich verstein das verd der "volkstrum" herr schiesencoft, but YOU do not son, so I am not the person who is making yourself out to be an idiot
Guess you couldn't answer the question?; crapped your pants and went to bed?
Guess you couldn't answer the question?; crapped your pants and went to bed?
No son started a fire in the wood stove son.
Like I said, boy your a volkstrum son, go look in the mirror and think about the loser YOU still defend son, it may come to you boy, but then again you might be that dense you will never get it.
Like I said, boy your a volkstrum son, go look in the mirror and think about the loser YOU still defend son, it may come to you boy, but then again you might be that dense you will never get it.
clif said...No son started a fire in the wood stove son.
OK. I'm with you on that. People in the city don't know how close they are to freezing w/o a wood stove. They don't know that nat gas or heating oil furnaces won't kick on w/o electricity.
Pax Vobiscum .......Busboy
OK. I'm with you on that. People in the city don't know how close they are to freezing w/o a wood stove. They don't know that nat gas or heating oil furnaces won't kick on w/o electricity.
Pax Vobiscum .......Busboy
I have used a wood stove since 1996 here and MY dad did most of HIS life, as Hank Williams Jr says, a country boy can survive, and I have been a country boy all my life.
I am on America's side NOT yours son.
America is worth defending, and removing the repugnant fooles who have done so much damage to her is the most important way to defend America today for the citizens, November was a very GOOD start, but we have a lot more to do th replace her righteous place America used to hold. I am not on your repugnant side because your just a volkstrum who defends those fooles who are destroying America boy.
Post a Comment
America is worth defending, and removing the repugnant fooles who have done so much damage to her is the most important way to defend America today for the citizens, November was a very GOOD start, but we have a lot more to do th replace her righteous place America used to hold. I am not on your repugnant side because your just a volkstrum who defends those fooles who are destroying America boy.
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]