Saturday, January 06, 2007
The NEXT real problem we are going to face (which repugnant spin cannot solve)
Yet some fooles will continue to come in here and spew idiotic false statements even though the reality is closing in around them. 2006 was a good year for energy prices and availability to Most Americans. However at some time, whether in 2007 or 2008 or maybe 2010 the amount the industrialized world demands for it's transportation, electric generation stations, chemical, pharmaceutical and fertilizer industries will outstrip the ability of the producing nations to pump fast enough. At that moment the entire western capitalistic world is going to change. No longer will we be able to take a drive in the country because gas is too expensive, and is only to be used if absolutely necessary. The cost of personal transportation will go up rapidly. Mass transit, especially that which can be provided by electricity from coal and hydro power will become a staple of existence. Too bad the repugnant neo-cons have tried hard to destroy Amtrak and underfund the mass transit in the United States. The Europeans are light years ahead of us there. In the 1970's I could travel across Germany by using the Bus lines to get into the city, the trams to get to the train station, and intercity rail to travel from town to town. Here with no investment for development and the idiotic demand that the future of mass transit be economically profitable it is been ignored for decades, and NOW when it could lighten our reliance on more and more oil and gas, it does NOT exist.As the year draws to a close, it is a good time to look back at what has happened and what clues we can discern about 2007.
The most notable event affecting the advent of peak oil during 2006 was, most likely, the great summer price spike. Oil started the year around $62 a barrel, steadily increased to just below $80 and then fell to close out the year about where it started. Now there are a number of observations that can be made about this spike.
First it drove average US gasoline prices from $2.21 in late December 2005 to a high of over $3.00 per gallon during the summer. This was significant in that it caught a lot of people’s attention for the first time that there just might be a problem out there. At the height of the spike, Congressmen were running around like rabbits proposing new laws and making pious speeches about how they were doing something about gasoline prices. Although the US economy as a whole seems to have held up pretty well under $3 gasoline, Detroit took a hard hit. Sales of low-mileage vehicles that had been the bread and butter of the US auto industry plunged, tens of thousands of auto workers lost their jobs, and dozens of factories closed. By year’s end Toyota was poised to become the world’s largest automotive manufacturer.
From the public’s point of view and unfortunately most of the media’s, peak oil seems to be only about gasoline prices. Above $3 a gallon there is concern. Let gasoline sink back towards $2 and we are back in Camelot.
The 2006 price spike is widely perceived as being caused by an excess of speculation. Hedge fund managers read forecasts of a bang-up hurricane season in the offing and that, coupled with greater-than-normal turmoil in the Middle East, led them to speculate wildly in oil futures. When the Middle East turmoil subsided a bit and the hurricanes failed to appear as advertised, oil prices collapsed. All this of course is perfectly true, but is only part of the story.
Largely unnoticed was the underlying supply and demand situation, and a new factor: oil affordability. The final returns won’t be in for several months, but it is beginning to look as if world oil production stayed about the same or increased insignificantly during 2006. Consumption in China, Russia, and the Gulf oil states increased while staying about the same in the industrialized states of North America, Europe and Asia.
With flat production and steady or increasing consumption in those countries that publish detailed reports, something had to give or else we would be seeing considerably higher oil prices. The give came in the underdeveloped world where $20 or $30 oil was affordable for generating electricity, running pumps, and for cooking, but $60 or $70 per barrel oil was not. Again, the returns are not in yet, but anecdotal evidence is accumulating that many parts of Africa, Central America, and Asia are starting to shut down. For these peoples, the oil age, such as it was, is already over. There is little to look forward to for a long, long time.
Nearly every aspect of the various Middle Eastern political conflicts deteriorated further during 2006. From the peak oil perspective 1.5 million barrels a day of Iraqi oil exports appear to be the most precarious, but what ever falls out of Iran’s nuclear ambitions are a close second. A general conflagration occasioned by the collapse of the Iraqi government or renewed Arab-Israeli fighting are well with in the realm of possibility for the near future. The insurgency in Nigeria is picking up steam and there will be either a presidential election or civil war there next year. The prospects for a large percentage of the world’s petroleum exports sure did not get any better in 2006.
When the history of the year is written, resurgent Russian nationalism is sure to have prominent place. During the year, Moscow made good on its goal to bring exploitation of Russian oil by the international oil companies back under its control. President Putin clearly sees the opportunity to regain superpower status by controlling a significant share of pipeline-supplied natural gas on the Eurasia landmass. It seems likely a reduced role for the international oil companies can only lead to reduced investment and delays in the exploitation of Russian oil and gas deposits.
As yet no major developments in the world’s oil depletion story have emerged in 2006. Production from numerous major oil deposits – the North Sea, Mexico’s Cantarell, Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay, Kuwait’s Burgan – continues to decline. Many analysts harbor suspicions that Saudi production has or will shortly go into decline. The situation is obscured, perhaps on purpose, by OPEC production cuts that have “required” the Saudi’s to make reductions in their oil production. It may take many years to sort out their actual production capacity.
So where do all the developments of 2006 leave us as regards to peak oil? Maybe further than is currently apparent. One thing is for certain, the earth has 30 billion barrels less cheap, easy-to-produce crude at its disposal than it did 12 months ago because we burned it up. World oil production currently is giving every indication of at least plateauing for a while, perhaps forever. Many new production projects are being delayed as the cost of exploration and drilling new wells increases to unheard of heights. Oil availability for the rich nations still appears adequate because the poor are shutting down. But this is a one-time phenomenon. Soon, increasing demand from the rich and rapidly developing nations will cause them to bid against each other for stagnant or decreasing production.
Then the troubles will begin in earnest.
There is no replacement for the hydrocarbon molecules which our chemical pharmaceutical and fertilizer industries are built on. As oil es increase, the costs these industries will go up and get passed on to the consumer. Drug prices already astronomical will simply become too expensive for the vast majority of citizens or their insurance companies to afford. Plastics upon which the modern post WW2 world is built on will become more scarce and expensive, with the associated products which are produced from plastic becoming more costly. As prices escalate in most areas, jobs will be lost as companies can no longer make enough money with ever falling sales of more expensive products. People will lose better jobs as companies which have not already been outsourced can no longer compete in the harsh environment or rising material energy and transportation costs.
One other area which will be severely affected, but has little good options available to it it our food production industrial farms. they will have rising costs for their machinery, energy demands and fertilizer costs, and as each becomes more scarce, it will become much harder and harder to produce enough food and get it to the markets at low enough prices to feed the ever enlarging poor people this country will have, let alone feed the ever enlarging poor nations and people around the world.
Countries will go to war for shrinking energy resources, and as those areas are destabilized and the infrastructures damaged in these wars (like they have been in Iraq as a result of that illegal invasion), the energy resources will become harder to produce and get to the western countries.
With every problem compounding each other problem the situation of the middle class life style the vast majority of American people are used to will disappear replaced by the struggle to survive. The US and every other modern industrialized nations will be reduced to a small but very wealthy class of owners who still can afford the good life and the rest of us struggling to survive, with no more middle class jobs and no health care with food costing much more as a part of ones earnings that is did in 2006.
Even though 2006 was a struggle for a good part of the people of this country, the future is not going to get much better, but much worse at some point. Jimmy Carter tried in vain to warn us in the late 1970's after the first energy shocks, but the repugnant fooles like Ronald Reagan ignored the bad news, spun the truth of the situation and set the US on the course where not only are we losing far to much in energy today both in lives lost in a war to gain control of ther oil in the middle east. when we could have put our great industrial power and intellectual capacity to solve the problem when it was noticed, Reagan and the Bush's denied the problem and aided with oil finds both in Alaska and Mexico were able to put off the day of reckoning. this time that is not an option and the pain and costs of finding the replacements for oil are much higher, and more urgent today then they were back then..this time no amount of repugnant spin will solve the problem, and we are so far in debt as a nation because of the illogical economic policies started by Reagan where he borrowed massive amounts of money to fund the government but had NO plan to repay that debt has financially tied the government hands at the same time the globalists have out sources a large part of out industrial base where the solutions could have come from. Thus we now are facing almost some of the very same quandaries that Jimmy Carter spoke to us about in 1980, but with far less money available for research and development and far less oil to tide us by until a solution is found, thanks Reagan, Bush41 and Bush43 for NOTHING, because that is really what you three have given this nation and it's future generations.
As the article mentions, LARGE oil field finds of the past are starting to decline, but nothing near their size is being found to replace them, much smaller fields and oil that used to be too expensive is being exploited, but it will never replace an Burgan in Kuwait let alone Ghawar in Saudi Arabia if that field has reached peak and is in decline. There is nothing left on this planet to replace these fields when they begin to play out as the US oil production has since 1970 when the US production reached it's peak. Today we as a nation produce 1,000,000 barrels less oil each day from our domestic fields than we did in 1980. We imported far less than 50% of our needs in 1980, but we import that today, and that percentage will continue to grow each year. we still get the vast majority of our oil from the US Canada, Mexico and Venezuela today, but with Mexico's production falling and Alaska's Prudhoe Bay also in decline we will eventually have to go to the middle east for oil, which is why Dick Cheney based his secret energy meetings in 2001 on maps of the Iraqi oil fields and the PNAC plan to topple Saddam and emplace a leadership in that government to allow the US companies to develop those fields for OUR benefit. From the perspective of energy and economic terms 2006 was not a very good year but far from a bad year, however one of these years in the near future will make 2006 seem like the Golden Age of our society.
Enjoy the "good times" while they last.
It's not an accident that Bush has purchased over 90,000 acres of land in Paraguay. This land is over the largest fresh water reserve on the planet. Of course! Not only do they want to control the oil.....they want to control our natural resources! It will be the Oil/Water Wars forever.
I hate them. Who is born to think like this? What makes them want this kind of power? It's so delusional to me. It makes me feel like I have a thousand spiders crawling all over my body everyday when I see the Bush Cabal and their people on my television!!!!
But it is very possibly what the future holds for us.
Larry, Clif, Kay; Why do I waste my time posting on your blog you ask? Because you guys are fighters and there's a chance that one day you may want to base your decisions on facts that are not evident to 25 year old journalists who write for the New York Times.
The republicans hate the French as evident in the last 6 years. Remember that? Couldn't call them 'French fries' anymore, but instead called them 'Freedom fries' (which is hysterical because it's the republicans who have actively taken away rights of US citizens)! The French have perfected the use of nuclear power, but it's the OIL MAGGOTS IN THE WHITE HOUSE WHO DON'T WANT TO GO THERE. It's people like them that are keeping America from progressing.
Name all the oil refinery companies in America in the last 6 years who have used their exorbitant profits to update their refineries? Americans would rather they use their profits to make their refineries less pollutant and more modern to pull and refine the oil faster, but the Oil Maggots would never think of doing such a thing! They would rather let a portion of the refinery blow up, poison the surrounding areas, and use the opportunity of the offline refinery to drive up prices. Lazy and criminal assholes!
Let's emulate the French. I'm all for that.
You waste your time on here Bushboy because you want to feel loved by people who despise you. Keep trying!! It will never happen. Until you stop applauding the lunatics in the White House, you're scum to us.
The End.
The REAL answer is proper conservation, QUIT wasting energy JUST to make dollar bills of profit, and renewable sources either solar, (which all fossil fuels are simply stored up solar energy son) and wind and geo-thermal.
Does it mean that we Americans will have to change our mind set of being the prima-donnas of this planet,
YES
Does it mean we Americans might have to use a hell of a lot MORE mass transit and a lot less cars to go get fatter at McDonald's ...probably.
Does it mean that IDIOTS like YOU will have to stop pimping for the gutless punk in Washington, and get over your selfish greedy mindset.....definately.
Deal with it asswipe.
Because this is only a discussion about what energy we have to use, NOT what it does to the earth's environment and the effects Global warming will have on every one of us on the only planet we have to live on son.
No matter how much bullshit you spew out son, the rules of mother nature will not change for your idiotic mindless devotion to the destructive policies championed by the Idiot Ronald Reagan and incompetently followed by Bush's both the ignorant father, and STUPID son.
Had our government not allowed the oil and auto companies to dictate what will be used for energy, we would already have alternatives.
Just like OIL uranium supplies ARE limited son, probably even MORE limited than OIL was, because the Uranium atom is one of the heaviest atoms and is much rarer given it has to be made in the largest stars and decays naturally.
Only an Idiot would suggest going from limited energy supply which is beginning to get scarce and expensive to a supply which has MORE drawbacks and problems like the waste problem which have NEVER been solved. Nuclear proliferation is a real problem, and NOT just because Iran or North Korea wants a bomb, but because the US allowed Israel to acquire over 200 of then ILLEGALLY with no penalty. We attacked Saddam because he was in violation of the Non proliferation Treaty, but have never said squat to the apartheid government in Jerusalem.
That is ONE problem, the next is the problem of Three Mile Island and Chernobyl to mention the two worst accidents, BUT they are not the only accidents.
No son following the rich assed bastards into a world of nuke plants just continues their ability to use such large expensive power production plants to dominate the rest of us.
We need a decentralized renewable power system which empowers the vast majority and takes the power away from the people which have allowed the poor to suffer and starve on the majority of this planet for their personal; GREED.
We need a system which does not allow a few rich bastards to get the country to fight an illegal war for their future enrichment.
Your just a little Eichmann in this system son, you spew disinformation and lies for the Idiot in the white house and his fellow war criminals. son you may think your right, but your ability to think through all the ramifications of what your pushing is as bad as the Dulles brothers who started BOTH the Fiasco's in Vietnam and the Middle east to allow the US to dominate the world's economy and political agenda.
The blowback of a failed war in Vietnam and the Iranian revolution of 1979, started in their offices in the 1950's, and their failed policies led Reagan and Bush 41 to set Saddam on his course of counter balance to Iran in the 1980's with that boomerang of problems he became, and they Reagan promoting the jihadists to fight the USSR in afghanistan, has led to Osama bin laden and the Islamic extremists rise to power in the middle east.
Today we have the IDIOT bush and his sycophantic followers like YOU welding the mess we have from the ashes of Saddam's Iraq to the anger and resentment of al Quaeda to create a monster which towers over any FAILED policies of the Dulles brothers.
You keep preaching for a war against Islam son, and with your pimping for the failed strategy of Bush in Iraq combined with the degradation of one of the worlds major religions just might give you as many problems as anything the idiot repukes gave us from the 1950's.
At some point you would think you idiots would learn, but first you would have to give up your arrogance and greed and demand of a "special" place for your idea of America on this planet we have to SHARE with the rest of humanity.
Until then son, you and morons like you will argue for MORE failed policies of forced subjugation of the rest of this planets population to the unrealistic demands of the corporate masters and the resulting wars and insurgencies when the rest of this planet refuses to bow down or surrender.
Just like OIL uranium supplies ARE limited son, probably even MORE limited than OIL was, because the Uranium atom is one of the heaviest atoms and is much rarer given it has to be made in the largest stars and decays naturally.
Clif, if what you say is true, how did all that uranium get into a water sand in Goliad, Texas, that isn't a thousand feet deep? Maybe the universe is a little more complicated than most believe. There is so much uranium in the state of New Mexico that it should glow in the dark. Energy production is a function of economics and politics. The twain rarely meet.
So Bushboy, you would be happy if there was no regulation over the making of bomb materials from uranium?
My name's not "Bushboy", I wouldn't be "happy", I just don't care. We supposedly have regs now; they don't work. Iran may soon glow in the dark along with N Korea. I wouldn't want regs that would stifle our nuclear weapons program. Fortunately our new "EMD" may make nuclear weapons obsolete.
Only foole think more MONEY always gets more oil, but very little oil will be produced out of the played out oil wells in Texas or Oklahoma or Pennsylvania.....which the DROP of US oil production since 1980 shows....no amount of dollars can replace the 1,000,000 barrels of OIL we are no longer pumping out of the ground.
Secondly son, Uranium production when you trying to capture very small amounts of atoms out of each GALLON of water pumped will get very hard to do with OUT the oil to make gas for the vehicles and machinery which mines or pumps it, let alone the requirement to transport it and refine it into reactor fissionable levels.
It might be possible both physically and economically as long as GAS and diesel is the energy source that powers most of the underlying machinery and transport vehicles, but if the price rapidly increases or supply falls the procedures they rely on could very well get either too expensive or fuels too limited to preform the required functions to achieve the necessary amounts of 5-7% enriched Uranium for a reactor.
BTW son you can spew stupid remarks about how much of something exists but it is as empty as your STUPID claim of victory in Iraq a couple of weeks ago son.
Keep acting like YOU know everything son, and I will ask Kay for permission to just delete your stupid unfactual posts where you spout a lot of shit and NEVER back up anything you say.
Your an IDIOT and a boring one at that.
Your an IDIOT and a boring one at that.
OK, let me get this right: You can say the moon is green cheese and not have to back it up. BUT: everything I say has to be backed up by an internet entry??? Sorry, FOOLE, Not all of the truth in the world is on the internet; and none of your's is. Your entire existence is to hate people who make more money than you. How pathetic.... You're posting on Kay's blog, a woman who works her ass off for a living and you're acting like royalty because you've got some kind of a 100% disability gov't stipend.. Check that shit at the door!!!
It is people LIKE YOU who must hate the troops since you want MORE of them to go and die for Bush's ego and repugnant greed.
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]