White Noise Insanity

What a great moment today to find out Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid wrote a letter to Bush telling him that escalating the illegal occupation in Iraq will be a serious mistake. The fact that they wrote this letter and had it on his desk before he came out with his plan to escalate shows me that they understand what the American people were telling them on election day. We don't want our soldiers to stay in an illegal occupation forever. We want them home and giving them 4-6 months to achieve that is a very reasonable suggestion to give Bush.

Here's the letter:

January 5, 2007

President George W. Bush

The White House
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President:

The start of the new Congress brings us opportunities to work together on the critical issues confronting our country. No issue is more important than finding an end to the war in Iraq. December was the deadliest month of the war in over two years, pushing U.S. fatality figures over the 3,000 mark.

The American people demonstrated in the November elections that they don’t believe your current Iraq policy will lead to success and that we need a change in direction for the sake of our troops and the Iraqi people. We understand that you are completing your post-election consultations on Iraq and are preparing to make a major address on your Iraq strategy to the American people next week.

Clearly this address presents you with another opportunity to make a long overdue course correction. Despite the fact that our troops have been pushed to the breaking point and, in many cases, have already served multiple tours in Iraq, news reports suggest that you believe the solution to the civil war in Iraq is to require additional sacrifices from our troops and are therefore prepared to proceed with a substantial U.S. troop increase.

Surging forces is a strategy that you have already tried and that has already failed. Like many current and former military leaders, we believe that trying again would be a serious mistake. They, like us, believe there is no purely military solution in Iraq. There is only a political solution. Adding more combat troops will only endanger more Americans and stretch our military to the breaking point for no strategic gain. And it would undermine our efforts to get the Iraqis to take responsibility for their own future. We are well past the point of more troops for Iraq.

In a recent appearance before the Senate Armed Services Committee, General John Abizaid, our top commander for Iraq and the region, said the following when asked about whether he thought more troops would contribute to our chances for success in Iraq:

"I met with every divisional commander, General Casey, the Corps commander, General Dempsey. We all talked together. And I said, in your professional opinion, if we were to bring in more American troops now, does it add considerably to our ability to achieve success in Iraq? And they all said no. And the reason is, because we want the Iraqis to do more. It's easy for the Iraqis to rely upon to us do this work. I believe that more American forces prevent the Iraqis from doing more, from taking more responsibility for their own future."

Rather than deploy additional forces to Iraq, we believe the way forward is to begin the phased redeployment of our forces in the next four to six months, while shifting the principal mission of our forces there from combat to training, logistics, force protection and counter-terror. A renewed diplomatic strategy, both within the region and beyond, is also required to help the Iraqis agree to a sustainable political settlement . . In short, it is time to begin to move our forces out of Iraq and make the Iraqi political leadership aware that our commitment is not open ended, that we cannot resolve their sectarian problems, and that only they can find the political resolution required to stabilize Iraq.

Our troops and the American people have already sacrificed a great deal for the future of Iraq. After nearly four years of combat, tens of thousands of U.S. casualties, and over $300 billion dollars, it is time to bring the war to a close. We, therefore, strongly encourage you to reject any plans that call for our getting our troops any deeper into Iraq. We want to do everything we can to help Iraq succeed in the future but, like many of our senior military leaders, we do not believe that adding more U.S. combat troops contributes to success.

We appreciate you taking these views into consideration.


Sincerely,


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi

Brilliant. Superb.

So, what does Bush do? He decides to shake up the Pentagon, which on the surface seems like a good idea, because as the Commander in Chief, one must get rid of those who won't listen and carry out the plan of the president. Instead, he got rid of the ones who HE wouldn't listen to and the ones who weren't speaking his language, of course. He decides to put in a Navy General to handle a ground war, which is so interesting to me, because the Bush Regime has put Naval ships in the Persian Gulf recently and they're sitting there as you read this. The fact that Pat Robertson ("mister God speaks to me and He has nothing nice to say about you Americans") said on his television show recently that God told him another 9/11 was coming to America in the form of a nuclear explosion tells me that ole Pat has some inside information from the "God" in the White House.

Prison Planet also believes that Pat Robertson is an insider and they're reporting that Dick Cheney will attack Iran if there is another major attack on our country even if Iran isn't behind it:

Televangelist Pat Robertson, an influential sage of the Neo-Con war machine and an icon of its radical ideological underpinnings, has predicted turmoil in 2007 after he claimed God had told him in a conversation that major U.S. cities would suffer mass terror attacks after September that would potentially kill millions of people.

Whether Robertson is simply recycling fearmongering propaganda or not, the fact remains that Dick Cheney's USSTRATCOM contingency plan calls for attacking Iran in the immediate aftermath of a 'second 9/11' - no matter who is behind it - which of course is going to be the cabal Dick Cheney fronts for itself and the same pack of murderers that are actively seeking to initiate global ethic cleansing and genocide to bring about world war three.

See where I'm going with this? Any attack on our nation will be blamed on Iraq, even if the attack is by the Bush Regime. I am one who DOES NOT believe that a bunch of guys with boxcutters tripped our nation's defense systems on 9/11/01 and I will not believe that Iran attacked us either.

We are being led by madmen. The Bush Regime is not working for the American people or even our soldiers. They have a separate agenda from us and I believe they are the first Administration to ever function like this. They won't listen to the advice of the democrats, but one thing is for sure, Pelosi & Reid have warned Bush and history will always be recorded as such.