Sunday, January 07, 2007
Who said the illegal occupation in Iraq isn't about oil? Silly fools...
From The Independent:
Future of Iraq: The spoils of war
How the West will make a killing on Iraqi oil riches
By Danny Fortson, Andrew Murray-Watson and Tim Webb
Published: 07 January 2007
Iraq's massive oil reserves, the third-largest in the world, are about to be thrown open for large-scale exploitation by Western oil companies under a controversial law which is expected to come before the Iraqi parliament within days.
The US government has been involved in drawing up the law, a draft of which has been seen by The Independent on Sunday. It would give big oil companies such as BP, Shell and Exxon 30-year contracts to extract Iraqi crude and allow the first large-scale operation of foreign oil interests in the country since the industry was nationalised in 1972.
The huge potential prizes for Western firms will give ammunition to critics who say the Iraq war was fought for oil. They point to statements such as one from Vice-President Dick Cheney, who said in 1999, while he was still chief executive of the oil services company Halliburton, that the world would need an additional 50 million barrels of oil a day by 2010. "So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies," he said.
Oil industry executives and analysts say the law, which would permit Western companies to pocket up to three-quarters of profits in the early years, is the only way to get Iraq's oil industry back on its feet after years of sanctions, war and loss of expertise. But it will operate through "production-sharing agreements" (or PSAs) which are highly unusual in the Middle East, where the oil industry in Saudi Arabia and Iran, the world's two largest producers, is state controlled.
Opponents say Iraq, where oil accounts for 95 per cent of the economy, is being forced to surrender an unacceptable degree of sovereignty.
Proposing the parliamentary motion for war in 2003, Tony Blair denied the "false claim" that "we want to seize" Iraq's oil revenues. He said the money should be put into a trust fund, run by the UN, for the Iraqis, but the idea came to nothing. The same year Colin Powell, then Secretary of State, said: "It cost a great deal of money to prosecute this war. But the oil of the Iraqi people belongs to the Iraqi people; it is their wealth, it will be used for their benefit. So we did not do it for oil."
Supporters say the provision allowing oil companies to take up to 75 per cent of the profits will last until they have recouped initial drilling costs. After that, they would collect about 20 per cent of all profits, according to industry sources in Iraq. But that is twice the industry average for such deals.
READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE...HERE.
Future of Iraq: The spoils of war
How the West will make a killing on Iraqi oil riches
By Danny Fortson, Andrew Murray-Watson and Tim Webb
Published: 07 January 2007
Iraq's massive oil reserves, the third-largest in the world, are about to be thrown open for large-scale exploitation by Western oil companies under a controversial law which is expected to come before the Iraqi parliament within days.
The US government has been involved in drawing up the law, a draft of which has been seen by The Independent on Sunday. It would give big oil companies such as BP, Shell and Exxon 30-year contracts to extract Iraqi crude and allow the first large-scale operation of foreign oil interests in the country since the industry was nationalised in 1972.
The huge potential prizes for Western firms will give ammunition to critics who say the Iraq war was fought for oil. They point to statements such as one from Vice-President Dick Cheney, who said in 1999, while he was still chief executive of the oil services company Halliburton, that the world would need an additional 50 million barrels of oil a day by 2010. "So where is the oil going to come from?... The Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies," he said.
Oil industry executives and analysts say the law, which would permit Western companies to pocket up to three-quarters of profits in the early years, is the only way to get Iraq's oil industry back on its feet after years of sanctions, war and loss of expertise. But it will operate through "production-sharing agreements" (or PSAs) which are highly unusual in the Middle East, where the oil industry in Saudi Arabia and Iran, the world's two largest producers, is state controlled.
Opponents say Iraq, where oil accounts for 95 per cent of the economy, is being forced to surrender an unacceptable degree of sovereignty.
Proposing the parliamentary motion for war in 2003, Tony Blair denied the "false claim" that "we want to seize" Iraq's oil revenues. He said the money should be put into a trust fund, run by the UN, for the Iraqis, but the idea came to nothing. The same year Colin Powell, then Secretary of State, said: "It cost a great deal of money to prosecute this war. But the oil of the Iraqi people belongs to the Iraqi people; it is their wealth, it will be used for their benefit. So we did not do it for oil."
Supporters say the provision allowing oil companies to take up to 75 per cent of the profits will last until they have recouped initial drilling costs. After that, they would collect about 20 per cent of all profits, according to industry sources in Iraq. But that is twice the industry average for such deals.
READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE...HERE.
Comments:
<< Home
How could Bush's illegal war and pending illegal escalation be seen as anything but oil.
Bush is a wanna be oilman. Bush's financial backing comes from big oil.
Haliburton is tied to the oil business thus reaps the spoils of Iraq for Cheney and Bush.
Bush is a wanna be oilman. Bush's financial backing comes from big oil.
Haliburton is tied to the oil business thus reaps the spoils of Iraq for Cheney and Bush.
Nice try, Dearth... but your insane sleight-of-hand won't work, here!
Socialism operates on the premise of force... which is your boss's and your hallmark. Sorry... it's still you against the world... and reason!
Check the pot and see if it's your brain that's boiling!
Socialism operates on the premise of force... which is your boss's and your hallmark. Sorry... it's still you against the world... and reason!
Check the pot and see if it's your brain that's boiling!
BTW... I'd get that MPD looked at if I were you. A good exorcist might help, too!
(Geez... must be the water!)
(Geez... must be the water!)
And we're just so glad you're here to straighten us hicks out, Bustoken.
Back so soon? What... Bossy couldn't get a leg up?
Back so soon? What... Bossy couldn't get a leg up?
Hi Rocky!!!! Thanks for mashing Bushboy into a paper thin pancake!!!
As you can see, I brushed him off the table after you were done. ;-)
As you can see, I brushed him off the table after you were done. ;-)
Kay... if the little wiener happens by again, make sure he gets his 'schedule' for the night, so he's not pestering us human folk...
7PM: The hen house
8:30 PM: The sheep pen
10PM: The cow pen
11PM: The sow pen
Midnight: (If he's not all worn out by now) That well-worn, well-greased hole in the plywood comprising the primate enclosure at the local zoo, where Willy; a 40 yr. old near-sighted, retarded chimp takes on all comers! He'll put a Vulcan lip-lock on Bushead's pee-pee hole and suck him straight outta his sneakers!
Catch you later!
7PM: The hen house
8:30 PM: The sheep pen
10PM: The cow pen
11PM: The sow pen
Midnight: (If he's not all worn out by now) That well-worn, well-greased hole in the plywood comprising the primate enclosure at the local zoo, where Willy; a 40 yr. old near-sighted, retarded chimp takes on all comers! He'll put a Vulcan lip-lock on Bushead's pee-pee hole and suck him straight outta his sneakers!
Catch you later!
As opposed to you puss boy, you just rope the sheep and tie them to a fence post when you "need a date".
Filius tu canis et cameli
Filius tu canis et cameli
Good work Kay. You should proudly display his pathetic rant imho.
Hiding the retard is rude to tards everywhere.
Hiding the retard is rude to tards everywhere.
good articlr though, anyone who doesnt realize this war was all about opening up Iraq's cheap undeveloped oil to the American Energy/oil Giants is clearly a fool or a liar.
Kay, re-read the end of the Susan Collins thread (A-blog) . . . from 2:33 a.m. down. good/fun times
* especially 3:19 a.m.
thought you should hear it from me first (-:
didn't want Chris in Maine to spill the beans . . . . . face is turning red, but don't give a shit
Oh yeah, good morning Doll . . . .
Post a Comment
* especially 3:19 a.m.
thought you should hear it from me first (-:
didn't want Chris in Maine to spill the beans . . . . . face is turning red, but don't give a shit
Oh yeah, good morning Doll . . . .
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]