Monday, January 15, 2007

 

Nobody Can Stop Me



This is my war and you can't stop me. I will not rest until the world is at war. I will not stop until I control the Mideast oil. I will not quit until I control the world.

I don't care what Congress or the American people think. I want more bloodshed and I can't be stopped.

Comments:
Or, this
 
Larry, the guy's POTUS; he's got 2 more years. Get your foole ready. It's your turn next.
 
he's closer to what a baby does Potty than potus, and thats not even counting the tantrums.

BTW are guy wont be a fool, like your fool in chief.

But you are correct, it will be our turn next necause the repugs will be finished for decades if they dont blow up the world first.
 
Mike, Busboy doesn't see the world falling apart in a Bush led swamp of violence and hate, he sees the world through eyes of dollar bills.

If there is anyhting left of this country when Bush gets done, maybe our guy can put some of the pieces back together.
 
Pussboy I see you got OVER the embarrassments of empty threats on the AMERICAblog eh gutless?
 
Bush doesn't want war, he's simply indifferent to it. War is a means to an end (control of ME oil for the long-term future of America), NOT a specific goal.

Bush is ruthless so if it means war to get what he wants, he'll go to war. Bush wants oil, everything else is secondary.

He'll not give a damn about those killed or maimed or raped or tortured, it's all unimportant to Bush unless the war numbers stop him from getting what he wants (because the numbers may inspire peace protests that could stop him).

Bush has never seriously considered the human misery of war unless it's from a perspective of the potential obstacle it may be to his Real Agenda.

This callousness is an integral part of being an authoritarian. Busboy is an authoritarian follower who will not question Bush but will follow him blindly and obediently because (following a professional pschological evaluation) authoritarian followers are;

1. submissive to authority
2. aggressive on behalf of authority
3. conventional
4. highly religious
5. intolerant
6. dogmatic
7. prejudiced (usually against homosexuals, women and followers of religions other than their own)
8. narrow-minded
9. strict disciplinarians
10. demand loyalty and return it
11. moralistic

Sound familiar?
 
NBC News' Andrea Mitchell reported on MSNBC that Saudi Arabia is mulling whether or not to send troops to Iraq, to "protect their interests" there.

So the Saudis are gearing up to involve themselves in the conflict, spreading it further. Just wait and see how Iran responds to Saudi Arabia’s involvement….

From Raw Story
A Chinese news agency called Xinhua has reported: U.S. might launch a military strike on Iran before April 2007, Kuwait-based daily Arab Times released on Sunday said in a report.
The report, written by Arab Times' Editor-in-chief Ahmed al-Jarallah citing a reliable source, said that the attack would be launched from the sea, while Patriot missiles would guard all Arab countries in the Gulf.
Recent statements emanating from the United States indicated the Bush administration's new strategy for Iraq doesn't include any proposal to make a compromise or negotiate with Syria or Iran, added the report.
The source told al-Jarallah that U.S. President George W. Bush recently had held a meeting with Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and other assistants in the White House, where they discussed the plan to attack Iran in minute detail.
Vice President Dick Cheney highlighted the threat posed by Iranto not only Saudi Arabia but also the whole Gulf region, according to the source.
"Tehran is not playing politics. Iranian leaders are using their country's religious influence to support the aggressive regime's ambition to expand," Dick Cheney was quoted by the source as saying.
Indicating participants of the meeting agreed to impose restrictions on the ambitions of Iranian regime before April 2007 without exposing other countries in the region to any danger, the source said "they have chosen April as British Prime Minister Tony
Blair has said it will be the last month in office for him. The United States has to take action against Iran and Syria before April 2007."
Claiming the attack will be launched from the sea and not from any country in the region, he said "the U.S. and its allies will target the oil installations and nuclear facilities of Iran ensuring there is no environmental catastrophe or after effects."
The source added that the U.S. has started sending its warships to the Gulf and the build-up would continue until Washington has the required number by the end of this month.
"U.S. forces in Iraq and other countries in the region will be protected against any Iranian missile attack by an advanced Patriot missile system," the source noted.
The Bush administration believes that attacking Iran will create a new power balance in the region, calming down the situation in Iraq and paving the way for their democratic project, which have to be suspended due to the interference of Tehran and Damascus in Iraq, according to the source.


Several points:
1. The Chinese are keeping a close eye on this, it’s obvious why…and how they’ll respond when their oil/natural gas supplies are cut off…
2. Look who’s behind the scenes again - DICK CHENEY!! And lying like the double authoritarian he is…“the aggressive regime's ambition to expand” …so much for Iran trying to expand, EVERY intelligence agency on the planet has stated Iran has shown no signs of preparing to invade any other country. These reports were issued in response to d. authoritarian warmongering regarding Iran’s nukes which don’t exist. Unlike Israel’s which destabilise the entire middle east. Iran is increasing it’s INFLUENCE but is NOT looking to “expand”! Huge difference.
3. So much for Gates’ admission that attacking Iran is a bad idea…he’s discussed attacking Iran in “minute detail” so it looks like he’s another double authoritarian who ‘suckered’ Americans by ‘telling them what they wanted to hear’…obtaining unanimous approval for his position by ‘fooling’ people would have made him feel FANTASTIC…
4. My ‘leader’ is yet again going to FOLLOW YOUR leaders……so Blair will be…
5. Causing a war with Iran before he slinks off and taking my country into a far greater peril than we’ve known here since WWII.
6. D. authoritarian lies regarding no adverse environmental effects…since when have attacks on nuclear facilities and oil refineries been environmentally friendly? As far as I know there’s never been an attack on a nuclear facility so…
a. how do they know the consequences of such an action?
b. detonating radioactive components is more likely to spread them than contain them…
c. read up on nanoparticles before you think blowing something up underground will contain it…
d. Hexafluoride gas is NOT something I would recommend anyone inhale…
7. The attack will come BEFORE April and the d. authoritarians will have enough firepower (so they think) by the end of January. So the attack is within the next several weeks.
8. There seems to be a LOT of reliance on the Patriot missile systems. Last time I saw them in action during Gulf I, they seemed to miss quite often…blamed on Scud’s breaking up on re-entry…but if Patriots were that effective, why worry about Iran’s missile system at all? And the Admin/Pentagon ARE worried about Iran’s missile systems or they wouldn’t be questioning the recent sale of missiles to Iran from Russia…
9. The d. authoritarians are lying about attacking Iran as a means of calming the situation in Iraq. They know full well it won’t.
10. Remember, once America invades Iran you’ll be stuck there with the same conditions as Iraq i.e. “if we knew then what we know now we wouldn’t have invaded but since we’re here we’re stuck with it now so we have to manage the situation as best as we can”…sound familiar?
11. Bush has also stated he’s going to ignore Congress so it looks like he’ll invade THEN ask for permission…

Oooooooooo…look…from Mosnews.com;
Russian Admiral Says U.S. Navy Prepares Missile Strike on Iran
“The presence of U.S. nuclear submarines in the Persian Gulf region means that the Pentagon has not abandoned plans for surprise strikes against nuclear targets in Iran. With this aim a group of multi-purpose submarines ready to accomplish the task is located in the area,” Admiral Baltin said.
He made the comments after reports that a U.S. submarine collided with a Japanese tanker in the Strait of Hormuz.
“American patience is not unlimited,” he said. “The submarine commanders go up to the periscope depth and forget about navigation rules and safety measures,” the admiral said.
Currently there is a group of up to four submarines in the Persian Gulf area, he said. So far they only control navigation in the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman, and in the Arabian Sea, he said. They might receive different orders in future: to block off the Gulf of Oman, that is the Iranian coast, and, if need be, launch missile strikes against
ground targets in Iran, he said.


Point 12. Looks like the Russians are interested in what’s happening in the ME too…it’s obvious why…and how they’ll react if it becomes apparent America is going to realise it’s ambitions of owning all the oil there…Russia will wait a while as you run down your military and run up your debts first…
13. “American patience is not unlimited”…I wonder if the Admiral was being tongue-in-cheek with that statement? What do you think…?
14. “So far they only control navigation in the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman, and in the Arabian Sea”…so Russia IS keeping an eye on just what you really control already…they won’t act until it looks like you’ll control the oil…they’ll let you get knocked about in the ME first…
15. D. authoritarians are hoping to attack Iran with submarines because they’ll realise their ships will be slaughtered.
16. Does Iran have sophisticated anti-submarine warfare i.e. anything that can be dropped by planes/launched from the coastline?
17. Russia has announced it has delivered a consignment of Tor-M1 anti-aircraft short-range missiles to Iran as part of a 1 billion military order.

So AMERICANS…what are you going to DO?
Crack jokes? Scream how ‘stupid’ Bush and Rice are? Keep blogging? Stay indoors? Keep warm? Stay dry?
 
"So AMERICANS…what are you going to DO?
Crack jokes? Scream how ‘stupid’ Bush and Rice are? Keep blogging? Stay indoors? Keep warm? Stay dry?"

Would a .300 Winchester round between the eyes qualify as affirmative action toward the Bush problem, BG?

Or a 7.62MM Nato pill for Blair?
 
Rocky, I'll REMIND you that it's Bush, NOT Blair, who's LEADING these warcrimes.

Sort Bush out, and you'll sort Britain out. Full stop.

It's YOUR country that's leading these wars, NOT mine OR the UN. So go get 'em tiger!
 
What, the British people suddenly have no backbone? Sort your own government out!

You afraid we'll bomb you if you don't play Iraqi-smacky with us? Gimmee a fucking break! Did you ever for one second think that maybe if there were a COMBINED international effort -- including the Brits getting off of their "fat arses" that maybe ol' Dub-ya might be forced a tad closer to capitulation?

You're good with advice, now maybe it's time to take some of it home, eh wot?!
 
Rocky "What, the British people suddenly have no backbone?"

Of course we have backbone, that's why we had the biggest pre-war demonstrations in the world.


"Sort your own government out!"

Agreed. The best way to do this is by dealing with the cause (America) rather than the symptom (Blair).


"You afraid we'll bomb you if you don't play Iraqi-smacky with us?"

No.


"Gimmee a fucking break! Did you ever for one second think that maybe if there were a COMBINED international effort -- including the Brits getting off of their "fat arses" that maybe ol' Dub-ya might be forced a tad closer to capitulation?"

You mean like we did BEFORE the war?
I'm afraid as much as you dislike your responsibilities these troubled times ARE YOUR responsibility. Why? Because it's YOUR 'leaders' who are causing these wars.


"You're good with advice, now maybe it's time to take some of it home, eh wot?!"

If you have anything constructive to write which would enable Americans to stop an escalation in war and I could help in ANY way I'll take it. How's that?

So what advice do you have? How can I help America most in your opinion? By dealing with the symptom rather than the cause?
 
"So what advice do you have? How can I help America most in your opinion? By dealing with the symptom rather than the cause?"

A kiss-up PM and parliament are YOUR problem, Matey. You deal with it at YOUR discretion. You see, unlike SOME PEOPLE, I wouldn't presume to know what renovations are right for someone else's house.

We don't pass the the buck here in America, just the ammo... like in 1776!
 
rocky "A kiss-up PM and parliament are YOUR problem, Matey. You deal with it at YOUR discretion."

No. Not when they're kissing up to GOOD American leaders. That's where YOU come in. If Britain didn't kiss up to American leaders you'd lose yet another ally. Ever stop to consider that?


"You see, unlike SOME PEOPLE, I wouldn't presume to know what renovations are right for someone else's house."

So recommending THE SAME COURSE OF ACTION taken by REAL patriots in the early 70's is too good for you is it?


"We don't pass the the buck here in America, just the ammo... like in 1776!"

You don't pass the buck? I thought the reasons for the things that have gone wrong with the war in Iraq were due to the Iraqi Government not 'stepping up to the plate'? Sarcasm off.
You pass the buck whenever it's in your interests to do so. And when the time comes to put your money where your mouths are you welch. Pathetic.

But please, keep mouthing off at me, rather than FOLLOWING THE EXAMPLE OF YOUR PATRIOTIC KINSMEN WHO DID HAVE THE BALLS TO 'STEP UP TO THE PLATE'.
 
Back again? Some trolls never know when to quit.

Okay, witless... let's see...

"If Britain didn't kiss up to American leaders you'd lose yet another ally. Ever stop to consider that?"

So what the fuck are you bitching about... Tony's doing his job! At least you admit your PM is a kiss-up.

"You pass the buck whenever it's in your interests to do so."

Yeah... England practically invented it. You've probably got grounds for copyright infringement!

"And when the time comes to put your money where your mouths are you welch. Pathetic."

Again... grounds for copyright infringement.

You're boring me, BG. Your self-righteous diatribes only prove that you're probably an unpleasant person to be around, as you really can't resist telling everyone how they should live or run their country. No doubt you're the same pain in the ass in your private life, too. Do you post your wife's orders on the fridge before you leave in the morning? Do your kids (God help them) wear uniforms and salute you?

Judging from your 'bio' you're used to TELLING and not LISTENING. That was evident from the very first time you 'appeared' on this blog. Explains a lot.

"But please, keep mouthing off at me, rather than FOLLOWING THE EXAMPLE OF YOUR PATRIOTIC KINSMEN WHO DID HAVE THE BALLS TO 'STEP UP TO THE PLATE'."

Who, pray tell, are those ballsy PATRIOTS you refer to... our servicemen, or those glorious old-timers in the 18th. Century that drove your English asses into the ocean when your pompous arrogance and incessant meddling became too much to tolerate!

You remind me of another idiot that likes to 'grace' this blog periodically. He thinks Bush can do no wrong... you should hook up with him. You both know it all, and it would be interesting to see which one comes out on top. Just imagine... TWO Jesus Christs in the same room!

Seriously, BG, you ought to get proactive. Get yourself a good rifle with good optics, and position yourself with a good view of 10 Downing Street. You're always blathering on about how complacent and ineffective we are here in America... give us an example, Love! Pop Ol' Tony a new asshole right in the forehead! And when they cart you off to Newgate to rot, all of your countrymen will shake their heads and quip: "Blimey... there ought to be a law!" There's complacency in action, Love!

I love these exchanges with you, BG. I do have to go away for a few days on business, but, like all things annoying, I'm sure you'll maintain a presence here during the interim. While I'm gone, you can meditate on what I've attempted to relate to you. There are probably many good counsellors in England (being it's such a high-strung and uptight nation) that could probably help you get in tune with others and not just yourself.

I promise to continue working with you as long as you need me. By the way, you might avoid any really DEEP dives... it's harmful to the brain!

Cheerio!
 
Rocky, you are right. The best way forward is for me to murder Blair. What was I thinking? Of course that will stop WWIII. Then I should shut up about protesting in America and blog in a friendly manner, nothing too provocative. Then I should stop pointing out the obvious so you can feel more comfortable having nice chats on blogs....

How could I be SO wrong? Clearly you are already taking every conceivable ACTION to stop WWIII.

Sarcasm off.


Keep throwing insults like a 5yr-old, don't whatever you do take any ACTION, just keep yakking, ignoring the CONTENT of my posts and recommending murder.

Don't put out any suggestions or SOLUTIONS, and don't use this blog to start organising protests.

It's clear for all to see how useful you are for America's future. What a patriot, you must be SO proud of yourself.
 
"Rocky, you are right. The best way forward is for me to murder Blair. What was I thinking? Of course that will stop WWIII. Then I should shut up about protesting in America and blog in a friendly manner, nothing too provocative. Then I should stop pointing out the obvious so you can feel more comfortable having nice chats on blogs....

How could I be SO wrong? Clearly you are already taking every conceivable ACTION to stop WWIII."



No problem, BG... you're forgiven! Happy diving, Love!
 
Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]